RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection has been implicated in several malignant and nonmalignant conditions. The confirmatory diagnosis of HP requires an endoscopic biopsy, followed by a rapid urease test, culture, and/or histopathologic examination using hemotoxylin and eosin, histochemical stains, or immunohistochemistry against HP. EndoFaster is a novel device that can perform real-time ammonium and pH measurements in gastric juice, allowing a diagnosis of HP during gastroduodenal endoscopy. GOAL: This study aimed to validate the accuracy of EndoFaster and to compare different histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques for the diagnosis of HP infection. STUDY: Consecutive patients who underwent upper endoscopy at our center were prospectively enrolled. During the endoscopy procedure, gastric juice was aspirated to perform an automatic analysis by EndoFaster and gastric biopsies were taken. Histologic sections were reviewed to assess the histopathologic features. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for the EndoFaster test, Diff-Quick (DQ), and immunohistochemistry against HP (anti-HP) using Warthin-Starry as the gold standard for HP detection. RESULTS: Overall, 80 patients were enrolled. In 19 cases (23,75%), histology was normal. In the remaining cases, varying degrees of inflammation were found. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 73.33%, 86.00%, 75.86%, and 84.31% for the EndoFaster test using 67 ppm/mL as the positive threshold; 73.33%, 100%, 100%, and 86.21% for DQ; and 79.31%, 88.00%, 79.31%, and 88.00% for anti-HP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The EndoFaster test has good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of HP during the gastroscopy procedure. DQ and anti-HP are excellent alternatives to Warthin-Starry for the detection of HP.
